Forum

Gripped » Gripped Forums » Rock » zone vs point-per-hold formats

Pages: [1] 2
Presentational Image Author Topic: zone vs point-per-hold formats
lacquement
Member
Posts: 27
lacquement
Post zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 7, 2008, 01:52

This came up on another thread, so I thought I would pose a question.  Since regionals and nationals have to be zone, why aren’t the locals?

btc
Member
Posts: 64
Mike
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 7, 2008, 06:35

In all Tour de Bloc Competitions the rules say that the finals have to be point per hold. I do believe the competition in question in the other post was a TDB comp. If a gym was to host their own comp they can use whatever format they want. If a gym wants to support Canadas climbing competition series, Tour de bloc is the only that i know of, we have to follow the same rules. To make things standard for these comps gyms are all supposed to follow the rules put out by Tour de Bloc. 
Hope that helps.

Mike Shannon, Owner
Beyond The Crux Climbing Gym Inc.
Kelowna, BC
http://www.beyondthecrux.com
(250) 860-7325 (PEAK)

jody
Member
Posts: 95
jody
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 7, 2008, 12:36

I believe that the venue holding the (local) comp has the option to use points per hold or zone format if they so desire.

lacquement
Member
Posts: 27
lacquement
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 7, 2008, 20:30

Thanks for the replies.
Jody, another question to you:

While it has been two years since I was last at one of your comps (I look forward to competing on the 16th though), I remember it being point-per-hold finals?  As one of the country’s most prolific setters, is there a particular reason why you go that route (pardon the pun) at the locals?

chris neve
Member
Posts: 79
Chris
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 7, 2008, 20:48

The progression, in my mind, will eventually have open finals with zone format at all levels but I don’t think we are ready for this yet.

Zone requires a little more logistics when setting the problems and I am not sure if most gyms have individuals completely familiar with setting in this manner. It does require a little more than just boxing the hold in the middle and calling this the bonus hold.

The idea with adding this format to nationals, then regionals, and then eventually locals is to allow both the competitors and gyms throughout the country to become more familiar with a format most had little experience with previously.

Since this is the format for international comps, zone format was instituted to better prepare any athlete who decided to compete overseas. This has worked well with the youth side, where our rules and comps are run in exactly the same fashion as the World Youth Championships so our athletes wouldn’t have to contend with an unfamiliar format as well as the challenge of competing in groups larger than they have ever seen before, in front of crowds larger and louder than they could ever imagine, etc.

With this training and experience, all the kids had to worry about was climbing and succeeding. It is our hope that, as the development of this sport continues, we will send more and more adult climbers to international competitions; using this model, it is believed our athletes will be more prepared using zone than other systems as they can develop strategies for competing within zone comps they can transfer to the world stage.

Hope this helps!

Chris Neve
CEC Adult Climbing Coordinator
http://www.competitionclimbingcanada.com

Chris

chris neve
Member
Posts: 79
Chris
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 8, 2008, 00:28

Also, I should add that the TDB has made the distinction of requiring finals for open at all of their local events - that’s awesome for competitors! Even though this series is sanctioned by the CEC, this does not mean other CEC-sanctioned events will have finals as that is left up to the competition organizers.

There is leeway right now but, again, I think the direction we are heading to is seeing international standards for all finals at all levels in the future… someday, when the time is appropriate and makes sense for everyone involved.

Chris

Chris

the vsion
Member
Posts: 80
Dung
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 8, 2008, 01:16

As comp organiser and route setter, the route setting for zone or by point is similar. The difference for Zone format, is to think of two boulder problem in one. The box hold/bonus is the one that should separate the two boulder problems.

The Zone format is way easier to judge, something to consider.

D

jody
Member
Posts: 95
jody
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 9, 2008, 00:21

There are some drawbacks for sure. It does require that the routesetter understand the field of competitors well. They don’t have to be a great routesetter but they do have to be able to tweak for a field. You can’t just set a ridiculously hard 20 move boulder problem and hope the better competitor makes it farther than other competitors, you actually have to make a problem that only one of the competitors can figure out/do.

I think that quote says it all as far as why locals aren’t zone right now.  I think that setters, organizers, judges, and competitors need to have a better understanding of what zone format requires before it can start to be used effectively.  I agree that it is a great format (I love it) but I don’t think that enough people understand it well enough for it to be used at all levels of competition.

With the growth of the TDB there are a lot of gyms holding comps that have not ever held a finals, let alone a zone format finals.  I think the increase in competitions is a great thing, and is/will do wonders for the growth of the sport.  I also think that a lot of these venues have very new setters and organizational teams who are just learning how to set fairly and host an event that runs smoothly. Perhaps expecting that they know their field and set accordingly is asking a lot.  Maybe we need a year or two more to let things just be before expecting all levels of competition to be at an international standard. Just my two cents.

K.P.D.
Jody

mike doyle
Member
Posts: 41
Mike
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 9, 2008, 03:25

I’ve been involved with competition climbing for a long time; as a spectator, competitor, routesetter, judge, organizer and coach. In the mid-90s when every competition was a little different we played with lots of different scoring systems. From this experience I say zone is the best format for serious bouldering comps.

Here’s a few reasons why I like zone:
*It is the easiest to set for.
- Set a crux before the zone and a crux before the top.
- Setting a point per hold route is difficult to make each move roughly the same difficulty. If every move is worth roughly the same amount of points then each move should be just as difficult.
- It allows you to use features and intricate movement that can’t be judged by distinct holds. Big features, cracks, mantles etc… all involve more than one ‘move’ but may use many or only one hold. Having a single ‘zone’ to separate the route allows you to use these techniques as a routesetter.
*Easier to judge. Other than the issue of control there is not much to bicker about here.
*Puts more emphasis on getting to the top of a boulder problem, which is the whole point of the boulder comps anyways.
*Is the international standard.

There are some drawbacks for sure. It does require that the routesetter understand the field of competitors well. They don’t have to be a great routesetter but they do have to be able to tweak for a field. You can’t just set a ridiculously hard 20 move boulder problem and hope the better competitor makes it farther than other competitors, you actually have to make a problem that only one of the competitors can figure out/do.

Here are some other criticisms I hear for zone:
- Zone is hard to understand. One of the things I can’t stand is the argument that ‘point-per-hold’ is easier to understand for spectators. In zone topping a problem out is the most important, how hard is that to understand? You’re not going to be able to convince me that the average spectator remembers how climbers A,B and C did on routes 1,2,3,4,5. They’ll remember which ones they topped out but not how far they got. In fact the best comps I’ve seen have a projector with a running tally of the competitors so the crowd, no matter how educated, can follow along. A great idea.
- Zone doesn’t reward a climber, even if they make it much farther than other climbers but not to the top or zone. This one is correct, zone does not reward a climber that doesn’t make it to the zone or to the top. I personally think that is the correct approach. If a climber makes it to the last move but can’t complete the problem then much more credit should be awarded to the climber that did make the last move.

Mike

Climbing is not a sport. It is a lifestyle.
my homepage

jody
Member
Posts: 95
jody
Post Re: zone vs point-per-hold formats
on: February 9, 2008, 20:20

laquement,
As per TDB rules I set points per hold in our finals.  I love zone format but a lot of setters lack the experience or understanding to set it effectively.  Overall it is way more consistent to have all the locals formatted the same way so for now, points per hold is the way.

Pages: [1] 2

Guest  

Show or hide header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires an account.

If you already have one you can login below. Otherwise, you can register for free.





Please leave these two fields as-is: