Forum

Gripped » Gripped Forums » Rock » sport anchors and accidents

Pages: [1] 2 3
Presentational Image Author Topic: sport anchors and accidents
slopey
Member
Posts: 156
pete
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 06:45

whilst the idea is a good one.  i disagree with the concept of making the crag fit the climber.

it is quite easy to clean an anchor without ever untying from the rope, this is a technique i would hope most people know.

If you baby proof the crags, people will stop taking the initiative to climb safely.

_____________________

check your head.

rock scaling = yes.

harihari
Member
Posts: 305
chris
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 07:47

It’s been very well established that making tbings safer does not decrease the overall # of accidents (see various older threads on here re: helmet use; google risk homeostasis).  Rather, what happens is, risky things get safer, so more people do risky things (those who formerly thought the activity too dangerous), and the increase in the # of participants offsets the increase in safety.  

It would be interesting to look at anchor accidents in trad vs. sport.  I have a feeling that despite the inherent dangers of trad anchors (ie they can blow), there will not be more accidents as a % of total # of anchors vs those involving sport climbing.

 

chris stolz

Watch an 18-pitch free route go up at
http://gumbiesoncrack.blogspot.com

doug
Member
Posts: 36
doug
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 15:37

no doubt we should all know how to rig anchors etc. just seems to me to be safer. darwin is always near at hand. people screw up. would be quicker as well. less waiting around, more time to climb! i will still do my small part in trying to make this happen. to each their own. have fun. doug

wfs
Member
Posts: 3
wfs
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 16:05

Everything would be stolen.

doug
Member
Posts: 36
doug
Post sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 19:27

i have an idea, which i’m sure many of you have talked about and considered. seems almost all sport climbing accidents happen when a climber is at an anchor attempting to thread or rappel. lately at a lot of crags clip and drop anchors are used on harder sport climbs. this virtually eliminates the need to ever untie whilst on a route, which in turn would eliminate most accidents. there are various forms of clip and drop anchors but really a couple of opposed gate carabiners attached to chain and bolts seems the easiest and cheapest. old biners could be easily changed when found to be worn out. this would be ideal at crags where less experienced climbers are working with anchors. these crags seem to experience the most accidents i’m willing to bet. sport climbing is about pushing your physical [and mental] boundaries. we can leave the anchor knowledge to the mountain folk. i vote we start doing our best to make climbing safer by changing and or adding onto all anchors to make them safer, as well as not taking carabiners left at anchors for this purpose. what do you all think? doug orr, ok falls b.c.

sark astiq
Member
Posts: 252
sark astiq
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 28, 2008, 20:47

We can leave the anchor safety to the mountain folk….

maybe we can leave the seatbelt wearing and road safety to the bus drivers, too?

gearheart
Member
Posts: 4
gearheart
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 29, 2008, 08:49

This makes perfect sense at sport crags.  Not stealing the biners seems pretty obvious too.  Todd

beebe
Member
Posts: 3
beebe
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 29, 2008, 10:16

Even if you accept risk homeostasis which is widely criticized, because in some things, like seat belts and smoking bans, the difference in the decrease in risk has actually been huge, it has to be replied in reverse here. Risk homeostasis argues that a series of unintentional decisions shifts the risk to another area in a whole complex system of thousands of parts-hence the Challenger explosion. What we’re really talking about here is removing a whole complex process (untying the rtope and threading the anchor) altogether, and this is one of the most dangerous in the whole sport climbing process. Even if the risk shifts slightly to other areas like clipping above the bolt, or paying less attention when belaying, the offset in terms of safety will be substantial.

As for making the crags safer, however, I agree with risk homeostasis folks that a really really safe world would suck anyway.

climbguy_1
Member
Posts: 6
climbguy_1
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 29, 2008, 11:50

I have to pipe up here and say that, while I can see where you are coming from, I think this is generally a bad idea.

There are certainly ways to feed an anchor without ever coming off belay or untying from the rope.  I have no idea why anyone would thread an anchor any differently.

I think the problem with accidents such as these is a simple lack of proper or formal education (ie. guide).  Ever heard of the broken telephone?  I think that allot of new climbers are learning from friends and others at the gym.  Sometimes this works out amazingly well and others not so much.  Anyone planning on or participating in outdoor sport climbing should know how to properly thread an anchor before partaking in that activity (as a minimum).  Its common sense to me.  If anything horrible happens at an anchor, the furthest one should ever fall is to the previous bolt.

Educate. By attempting to fool proof the craigs, we would simply be inviting more un-informed people to participate in a risky activity and generally end up causing more accidents in the long run.

harihari
Member
Posts: 305
chris
Post Re: sport anchors and accidents
on: October 29, 2008, 16:52

Beebe– What do you mean when you assert that smoking bans work? 

Smoking bans work because they affect people other than smokers (other patrons, servers etc at restaurants).  Smokers themselves do not benefit; and smokers who quit do not, as a group, live longer than those who continue [it's true, and it's not for health reasons].  The per-passenger-per-mile-driven rate of death as a result of seatbelt (and other safety measure) legislation, true, has dramatically decreased.  However, the per-capita rate of death has not changed.  As things get safer, more people drive, and those who drive take other risks.  From 1970 to 1980, there was no significant difference in the per-capita death rate between countries with an without seatbelt laws.

And yea, this is silly…perhaps one finally ought to say, if you are dumb enough not to know even the basics (clip to anchor with a draw when setting upa lower/rap) then you get a climber’s Darwin Award.

WHich, come to think of it, would make a great thread…

chris stolz

Watch an 18-pitch free route go up at
http://gumbiesoncrack.blogspot.com

Pages: [1] 2 3

Guest  

Show or hide header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires an account.

If you already have one you can login below. Otherwise, you can register for free.





Please leave these two fields as-is: